Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:48:20AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Yes, maybe it is better to leave tuareg-mode out (or to just put
> a Suggests on tuareg-mode, to give a hint to those who want to
Agreed.
> use emacs). On the other hand the ocaml package itself installs
> emacs files, too. On the long run it might be good idea to remove the
> emacs stuff from the ocaml (binary) package and to build a
> separate package ocaml-mode from the ocaml source package.
Yes, a separate ocaml mode for Emacs would be better.
Let's call it "ocaml-elisp" or "ocaml-mode".
--
Jérôme Marant
Reply to:
- References:
- lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
- Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- From: Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant@fr.thalesgroup.com>
- Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- From: Ralf Treinen <treinen@club-internet.fr>
- Prev by Date:
Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- Next by Date:
Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- Previous by thread:
Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- Next by thread:
Re: lablgtkmathview, netstring, xstr, netclient, pxp, meta-ocaml
- Index(es):