On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 02:42:38PM +0100, Georges Mariano wrote: > Sorry, but I can't remember the reason why you _have to_ change > the upstream name ? (i.e what's the problem with it ?) Because we need a consistent naming schema for ocaml libraries. The one proposed by Sven is ok for me and surely is ok also for him. If you really wants to, we can vote and take a global (i.e. the one that we will put in the ocaml debian policy) decision. IIRC, you only dislike this naming schema. Note that we are not discussing about the camlimage new package name, we are discussing about the schema (i.e. lib*-ocaml). Next, remaining in the schema, if you think that libimages-ocaml is a better name I can also choose it, but in such a case the upstream name is even more hidden. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy zack@cs.unibo.it | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
Attachment:
pgpdHi2Zmky2I.pgp
Description: PGP signature