Re: ocaml packaging policy ... (some points review)
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 06:10:38PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:30:55AM +0100, Sven wrote:
> > > > :))
> > > :((
> >
> > BTW, what about things like camlimage or camlzip or other such ?
> > should they become :
> > libcamlzip-ocaml or libzip-ocaml ?
> > The first one is more straightforward, but redoundant.
>
> The latter.
but, it will break in some case (take mlgtk and lablgtk for example).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: