On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:30:55AM +0100, Sven wrote: > > > :)) > > :(( > > BTW, what about things like camlimage or camlzip or other such ? > should they become : > libcamlzip-ocaml or libzip-ocaml ? > The first one is more straightforward, but redoundant. The latter. > And Georges, if you don't like this scheme, what do you propose ? Aaarrgghhh, NO, PLEASE NO. Please don't start again the naming schema thread. I can accept whatever schema you like, but please don't start that thread again. :-))) Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy zack@cs.unibo.it | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
Attachment:
pgpBgCHAmLhGG.pgp
Description: PGP signature