Re: ocaml packaging policy ... (some points review)

[Sven <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>]

On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 10:28:13AM +0100, Georges Mariano wrote:
> 
> > > >        - libxxx-ocaml will provide the shared library
> > > >        stubs, and all other stuff needed to run a dynamic
> > > >        loading ocaml bytecode executable that
> > > 
> > > yuk, I like this naming schema :-)
> > 
> > :))
> 
> :((

BTW, what about things like camlimage or camlzip or other such ?

should they become :

libcamlzip-ocaml or libzip-ocaml ?

The first one is more straightforward, but redoundant.

And Georges, if you don't like this scheme, what do you propose ?

Friendly,

Sven Luther