Re: license requirements for a book to be in free section
Scripsit Stefano Zacchiroli <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 01:12:47PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > Okay, so it says "aggregate", and selling _a_ book does not do in an
> > aggregate form. So I guess we need the right to modify and distribute
> > for documentation to be free.
> Following this idea, the requirement imposed by O'Reilly doesn't violate
> the DFSG ...
Would they protest if someone bound hardcopies of the book together
with (say) the GCC manual in a single volume, and sold such volumes
Henning Makholm "I consider the presence of the
universe to be a miracle. The universe
and everything in it. Can you deny it?"