Re: license requirements for a book to be in free section
> They also told me that they don't want to allow the commercial
> distribution of the book, anyway again in their opinion this doesn't
> violate the DFSG.
As someone who has packaged documentation before, I'm surprised that
Debian would agree with this. It's clearly non-free for software, and I
don't see what's so special about documentation to be exempt. The GNU
Free Documentation License allows it.
We really need policy on on free documentation.