On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 09:39:18AM +0100, Georges Mariano wrote: > ocaml-libXXX is much more interesting since : > the main part/criteria of interest is first : ocaml > then comes the "usage" (the 'base', the 'tools', the 'libs'... and so > on) Does not seems to me a valid point for break an almost standard (there are a lot of perl package that follows this schema). Think also about the pool structure, package that starts with "lib" are kept in a separate tree, why you want that ocaml libraries will not be included in this tree? A user knows that all libraries are kept in the "lib" tree. Your problem could be easy solved using filtering (with grep) or using a more structured section approach that isn't to far to be accepted in debian. Cheers. -- Stefano "Zack" Zacchiroli <zack@cs.unibo.it> ICQ# 33538863 Home Page: http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro Undergraduate student of Computer Science @ University of Bologna, Italy - Information wants to be Open -
Attachment:
pgpRwNyFgvGbD.pgp
Description: PGP signature