Re: ocaml 3.04-2 and ocaml-doc 3.04-1
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 01:34:58PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Sven <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> writes:
>
> > No, i do no such thing, since ocaml has as source package the plain unmodified
> > upstream tarball (ocaml-3.04.tar.gz), while i did a small source package for
> > the documentation, regrouping all the different documentation files available
> > separatedly (dvi, txt, ps, pdf, info and man).
>
> How was the documentation managed in the previous versions of the package?
> There was no documentation in the main tarball?
NO, it hasd ever been done so, as should be ...
> > It would have been easier if we had the upstream latex source, but they don't
> > want to release it.
>
> Why don't they want to release the html source?
Because they don't want people to modify them, i think.
(html is available, just not the latex one)
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: