Re: ocaml 3.04-2 and ocaml-doc 3.04-1
Sven <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> writes:
> No, i do no such thing, since ocaml has as source package the plain unmodified
> upstream tarball (ocaml-3.04.tar.gz), while i did a small source package for
> the documentation, regrouping all the different documentation files available
> separatedly (dvi, txt, ps, pdf, info and man).
How was the documentation managed in the previous versions of the package?
There was no documentation in the main tarball?
> It would have been easier if we had the upstream latex source, but they don't
> want to release it.
Why don't they want to release the html source?
--
Jérôme Marant
Reply to: