Re: ocaml 3.04 packaging issues ...

[Sven <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>]

On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 09:08:53AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> writes:
> 
> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 03:17:14AM +0100, Sven wrote:
> > > Ok, let's make such a policy document from the result of discution on this
> > > thread.
> > 
> > anohter idea for the policy: I think that is a good idea to rename all
> > the ocaml libraries. Currently we have something like: ocaml-pxp,
> > ocaml-xstr and so on, a clever naming schema maybe a perl like schema,
> > i.e. libpxp-ocaml, libxstr-ocaml.
> 
>   I would propose something else :
>   - libsomething-ocaml for ocaml bindings on exixting libraries
>   - ocaml-something for other ocaml modules.
> 
>   For instance, libgtk-ocaml.

But what would the upstream authors think of such a renaming ? 

Also we should coordinate such a move with the CDK guys, altough they have
been ignoring us  in the past.

Friendly,

Sven Luther