Re: [camlidl
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 07:16:08PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 06:14:43PM +0100, Sven wrote:
> > No, i will not go with embedding anything in the ocaml package, the ocaml
> > package is as distributed upstream and should stay so. Also this is the wish
> > of upstream also.
> >
> > It could be a good candidate for the ocaml-tools or whatever package though.
>
> Ok, IMHO we can go for it and build camlidl and camlidl-doc packages, I
> can do it.
>
> Anyway if Ralf also think that camlidl can well suite with other
> ocaml-tools we can include it in this package, perhaps only with html
> documentation.
maybe a ocaml-libs or ocaml-contriblib should be better, since ocaml-tools
contains tools (programs) which help to work with ocaml, not libraries.
Friendly,
Sven LUther
Reply to: