Re: mmm (was: Re: camlimages)
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 06:09:00PM +0100, Sven wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 09:15:34PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> >
> > And the licence does not allow binary distribution of derivative work,
> > which means that it is non-free anyway.
>
> As said, the licence should be no problem, i have lost previous mails on the
> subject in a disk crash, but i seem to remember that this should be no
> problem.
Did they release it under a different licence, then? The licence as it stands
is non-free.
-Ralf.
Reply to: