Re: tuareg et/ou ocaml-dev ?
Sven Luthe wrote:
> the ocaml-utils should only contain all the stuff that is too small to need a
> package of it's own, and that is not yet packaged by itself. In particular if
> the size of the stuff who is needed for packaging is more than the size of the
> thing packaged, it is not worth a sandalone package.
I agree.
> > - ocamlp4 (is the licence OK ? I have some doubt concerning the advertisment
> > clauses)
>
> Err, is this different from camlp4, which is already a debian package ?
No idea, I don't use. It was Georges who proposed this.
> That said, is graphviz really needed for ocamldot, or only for
> vizualization/useage, if not then we could change the depend to a suggest
> alone or something such, and keep it in main.
Policy, Section 7.2:
The Depends field should be used if the depended-on package is required for
the depending package to provide a significant amount of functionality.
The Recommends field should list packages that would be found together with
this one in all but unusual installations.
Suggests. This is used to declare that one package may be more useful with
one or more others.
Hence graphviz might be a Recommends, but certainly not Suggests.
> And is the tuareg mode installeable alongside the ocaml provided emacs mode ?
Yes, AFAIK.
-Ralf.
Reply to: