Re: problems with compilation with lablgl.
Thanks a lot!
after I installed
tcl8.0-dev, tk8.0-dev
then it worked.
The problem is solved, please add this dependencies/suggest field.
Now I will try to get the hardware acceleration working with the example
files...
Thanks again,
Peter Rönnqiust
At Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:51:40 +0100, Sven LUTHER <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
wrote:
>
>On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 08:22:00AM +0000, peter_ronnquist@hushmail.com
>wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This is my first email to the debian-ocaml-maint list and I am not
>100%
>> that this email fits this mailing list, but it was the one that I
>thought
>> matched best. Please cc me if you respond since I only read the mailing
>> list archives on the debian www site. Thank you.
>
>Well, you should have filled a bug against lablgl, this is the way this
>kind
>of things work.
>
>(mail to submit@bugs.dbeian.org with Package: lablgl and Version: <version
>num> in the body)
>
>> is there anyone else who have problems with compiling the examples
>in lablgl?
>
>mmm, no, i don't have problems, should work ok.
>
>> When I try to compile the simple.ml example then I get the following
>error.
>
>mmm, ...
>
>using lablgl+lablgtk i do :
>
>ocamlc -I Objets -I /usr/lib/ocaml/lablgtk -I /usr/lib/ocaml/lablGL
>-custom -c opengl.ml
>
>> ronnquis@debian:~/development/ocaml/test$ ocamlc -labels -I /usr/lib/ocaml/labltk
>> -I /usr/lib/ocaml/lablGL -I /usr/lib/libtk8.0 labltk.cma lablgl.cma
>togl.cmo
>> simple.ml -o program
>> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ltk8.0
>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>> Error while building custom runtime system
>
>Erm, ...
>
>do you have tcl/tk8.0-dev installed ?
>
>Please tell me if that solves the problem, as if it does, i will add
>it in the
>depends/suggest field ...
>
>> But I have /usr/lib/libtk.8.0.so.1 and I can run the example with
>toplevel:
>> lablgl -labels simple.ml
>> works fine.
>
>Sure, tcl/tk is already compiled in there, so no need for the -dev packages.
>
>Hope this hepls ...
>
>Sven Luther (the lablgl maintainer ...)
>
>Friendly,
>
>Sven Luther
>
Reply to: