On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:26:36PM +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: >I'm his sponsor for the jd package since 2006 and think that he >should be allowed uploading for the reviewed packages. He will >be a good Debian Maintainer. Please tell us why he will (or is) a good package maintainer. :) [ The following lines were taken from http://wiki.debian.org/Maintainers ] Debian Developers advocating Debian Maintainer candidates (or potential Debian Developers for that matter) must go into a bit more detail in their advocacy. If the Debian Maintainer candidate has done "a great job", please explain what "a great job" means -- is there something special the candidate has done, or is it that whatever the candidate is working on is particularly important, or is the candidate remarkably consistent, or what? What has the candidate actually done that has earnt your trust? What makes the candidate special compared to the other folks who are helping Debian? What in particular about the candidate's work should people lurking on the Debian lists be trying to emulate if they want to be a Debian Maintainer or a Debian Developer? For example, if the Debian Maintainer candidate has good packaging skills, go into a bit more detail about what's convinced you the candidate has got those skills? Are there any difficult bugs you've worked together on, or new features the candidate has done a good job of getting into Debian, or has the candidate been particularly helpful supporting users, or...? Très cordialement, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar -- "Freiheit ist immer die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" Rosa Luxemburg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature