[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: first packages for mipsel

> On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 01:09:58PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> There are multiple solutions to this problem:
> - ll/sc emulation in the kernel
>   Implementing an ll/sc emulation into the fast path of the illegal
>   handler and compile the glibc with ll/sc support.
> - repair sysmips
>   Sysmips is essentially broken - My fix i have sent to the linux-mips
>   is only a workaround but not a fix. Also there is currentl NO ISA I
>   in the sysmips implementation. I hope to get around to build a proper
>   fix this weekend in assembly.
> Probably we will do both - An even better solution would be to let the
> detect the ISA level or the existance of ll/sc in userspace and replace
> with one or the other primitiv - Using sysmips on R3000 or ll/sc less

What advantage would there be to using sysmips() as opposed
to doing the ll/sc emulation?  It seems to me that the decode path
in the kernel would be just as fast, and there would be a single
"ABI" for all programs - the ll/sc instructions themselves.

            Kevin K.

Reply to: