On Thursday, July 31, 2025 4:14:04 PM Mountain Standard Time Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 04:10:25PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > > On Thursday, July 31, 2025 1:03:51 PM Mountain Standard Time Tiago > > Bortoletto > > > > Vaz wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 08:02:39AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > > > > All, > > > > > > > > This is in the NEW queue, closing. > > > > > > Please do not close ITP bugs as they'll be automatically closed once > > > the packaged is accepted by ftp-master. They're in NEW but can still be > > > rejected. > > > > As far as I can tell, Phil closed the RFS bug, not the ITP bug. Closing the > > RFS bug is the correct behavior when a package enters NEW. You are correct > > that any ITP bug should remain open and will automatically be closed when a > > package clears NEW. > > All good then, thanks for pointing out! The name of the bug is non-standard and includes both RFS and [ITP], so it is easy to get confused about which bug it actually is. -- Soren Stoutner soren@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.