[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1001957: marked as done (RFS: memtest86+/5.01-4 [NMU] [RC] -- thorough real-mode memory tester)

Your message dated Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:31:11 +0800
with message-id <1b26ab4814bcc94b6cf3175a78dc284f30ef70f5.camel@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: memtest86+/5.01-3.2 [NMU] [RC] -- thorough real-mode memory tester
has caused the Debian Bug report #1001957,
regarding RFS: memtest86+/5.01-4 [NMU] [RC] -- thorough real-mode memory tester
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1001957: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1001957
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "memtest86+":

 * Package name    : memtest86+
   Version         : 5.01-3.2
   Upstream Author : Samuel Demeulemeester <memtest@memtest.org>
 * URL             : http://www.memtest.org/
 * License         : GPL-2
 * Vcs             : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/memtest86plus
   Section         : misc
After saw memtest86+ orphan and with mark for autoremoval from testing I prepared an MR that fix the RC bug and few small changes including some the maintainer already prepared on git long time ago.
you can see it here: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/memtest86plus/-/merge_requests/1 and as requested I uploaded to mentors ftp and open this RFS.
In latest years I see that memtest86+ 5.01 don't works or don't works correctly on many recent computer/servers so I thinked to do other improvements, fixes and update to 5.31b for an experimental build (and later return having it good in debian/ubuntu install and iso instead use any time another specific memtest updated iso when needed), I started did it here: https://salsa.debian.org/fantu-guest/memtest86plus/-/commits/debian/experimental but I want do more testing before request an upload for this other build for experimental. Any suggestion/help is appreciated. A thing that I think to be useful now if possible is an access to debian repository of memtest86+ for push work done (or if someone want at least push from my fork upstream/latest, upstream/5.31b, debian/master and debian/experimental and switch default branch to debian/master) 


It builds those binary packages:

  memtest86+ - thorough real-mode memory tester
To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: 

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/memtest86+/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/memtest86+/memtest86+_5.01-3.2.dsc 

Changes since the last upload:

 memtest86+ (5.01-3.2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Fabio Fantoni ]
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * switch package to use dh and bump compat to 12
     (Closes: #999226, #965720)
   * update debian/watch
 .
   [ Yann Dirson ]
   * Add Vcs-* fields for salsa repo.
   * Add Dutch translation (Closes: #765362)
   * Add Brazilian Portuguese translation (Closes: #787752)
   * Remove usage of obsolete dh_buildinfo

Regards,
--
  Fabio Fantoni

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 23:53:10 +0100 Fabio Fantoni wrote:

>   memtest86+ (5.01-4) unstable; urgency=medium
>   .
>     [ Fabio Fantoni ]
>     * QA upload.

Thanks for your work on this Fabio, I've uploaded it to Debian.
For future uploads please file an RFS, I'm not sure I will sponsor.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
Reply to: