[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#991282: RFS: runit/2.1.2-41exp1 -- system-wide service supervision



Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: plorenzo@disroot.org

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit":

 * Package name    : runit
   Version         : 2.1.2-41exp1
   Upstream Author : Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
 * URL             : http://smarden.org/runit/
 * License         : GPL-3+, BSD-3-clause
 * Vcs             : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/runit
   Section         : admin

It builds those binary packages:

  runit-init - system-wide service supervision (as init system)
  getty-run - runscripts to supervise getty processes
  runit-systemd - transitional package for runit-systemd users
  runit-run - service supervision (systemd and sysv integration)
  runit - system-wide service supervision

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/runit/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/runit/runit_2.1.2-41exp1.dsc

Git repo:

  https://salsa.debian.org/Lorenzo.ru.g-guest/runit/-/tree/2.1.2-41exp

Changes since the last upload:

 runit (2.1.2-41exp1) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * Set rules-requires-root to no
   * Runit-run: drop dependency on runit-systemd | sysvinit-core
   * Runit: get rid of ancient transition code in prerm
   * Add upstream metadata
   * Add support for policy-rc.d hack in invoke-run
   * Update invoke-run manpage for policy-rc.d
   * Update News files
   * Shutdown.c:
     - fix wrong command line parsing logic that always
       caused a No-Op when any option was given, breaking,
       among other things, the init switch from Sysvinit
       (Closes: #991227)
     - reboot the system with -r flag (Closes: #990774)
   * Update shutdown(8) manpage
   * Update license and copyright years

Regards,
-- 
  Lorenzo Puliti


Reply to: