Bug#978440: RFS: paperwork/2.0.2-1 -- Personal document manager
Hi Mechtilde,
El 14/2/21 a les 14:41, Mechtilde Stehmann ha escrit:
> Hello Leopold,
> hello all,
>
> does it also build at buildd after a source only upload.
ok
> At the official build machines it is n't allowed to install a package
> which isn't called in debian/control beside the essential build packages.
yes, you are right.
> You have to call *all needed* packages for building in debian/control.
> Otherwise it can't be build at the official build machines.
Yes, it's true. But, this is not the case. It call all the dependencies
to build the package. But it fails *before* you call pbuilder in a clean
env.
> This should be ensured by pbuilder. You have to be able to build in a
> clean pbuilder chroot.
I have a pbuilder installation to build packages. I'm using pbuilder,
and I built a lot of backports to myself. The server where I run
pbuilder is a Debian stable with several packages installed, nothing
important. Without sphinx-common, when I try to build paperwork, from
salsa I got:
$ pdebuild
W: /root/.pbuilderrc does not exist
dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: Unmet build dependencies: python3-sphinx
python3-sphinxcontrib.plantuml sphinx-doc
W: Unmet build-dependency in source
dpkg-source: info: using patch list from debian/patches/series
dpkg-source: info: applying
0001-Search-for-data-files-in-system-folders.patch
dpkg-source: info: applying
0002-Show-all-page-at-once-until-python3-getkey-gets-pack.patch
dpkg-source: info: applying 0003-Disable-potentially-dangerous-plugins.patch
dh clean --with python3,sphinxdoc --buildsystem=pybuild
dh: error: unable to load addon sphinxdoc: Can't locate
Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/sphinxdoc.pm in @INC (you may need to install
the Debian::Debhelper::Sequence::sphinxdoc module) (@INC contains:
/etc/perl /usr/local/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.28.1
/usr/local/share/perl/5.28.1 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl5/5.28
/usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.28
/usr/share/perl/5.28 /usr/local/lib/site_perl
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl-base) at (eval 15) line 1.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 15) line 1.
make: *** [debian/rules:38: clean] Error 25
Before, pbuilder is call. However, if I install sphinx-common and run
again pbuilder paperwork is built.
Another thing is if you really need to call:
dh $@ --with python3,sphinxdoc --buildsystem=pybuild
with sphinxdoc.
In any case, salsa C-I is passed and doesn't fail, and AFAIK they use a
similar env as build machines. Please, DD, push this package. It would
be a pity that we don't have this version in Bullseye.
Best regards,
Leopold
> Kind regards
>
> Mechtilde
>
> Am 14.02.21 um 14:15 schrieb Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda:
>> Mechtilde,
>>
>>
>> El 14/2/21 a les 14:04, Mechtilde Stehmann ha escrit:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> dh clean --with python3,sphinxdoc --buildsystem=pybuild
>>> dh: error: unable to load addon sphinxdoc: Can't locate
>>> Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/sphinxdoc.pm in @INC (you may need to install
>>> the Debian::Debhelper::Sequence::sphinxdoc module) (@INC contains:
>>> /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.32.1
>>> /usr/local/share/perl/5.32.1 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl5/5.32
>>> /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl-base
>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.32 /usr/share/perl/5.32
>>> /usr/local/lib/site_perl) at (eval 14) line 1.
>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 14) line 1.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>
>> IMHO the problem that you have here is that you have not installed in
>> the box where you run pbuilder or gbp the package sphinx-common.
>>
>> That package contains the file
>> sphinx-common: /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/sphinxdoc.pm
>>
>> that needs Debhelper to prepare the package to be built.
>>
>> I have backported paperwork without any problem.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Leopold
>>
>
--
--
Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Reply to: