[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Help] pvm: ftbfs with GCC-10



Andreas Tille writes:
> while I do not intend to maintain pvm personally some Debian Med package
> depend from it.  Thus I like to see bug #957717 fixed but I need help.

Do people still use PVM for parallel computing?  I thought it was
replaced by MPI decades ago.

If use of PVM is optional, I would consider disabling use of PVM in
reverse dependencies and just remove the unmaintained PVM package from
Debian.

Ansgar


Reply to: