Re: package prevented from migration due to "regression", but regression bug is fixed

[Stephen Sinclair <radarsat1@gmail.com>]

Thanks for the reply and to Adam Borowski for closing the bug and
having it migrate to testing for me.

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 4:56 PM Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 04:51:01PM +0200, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
> That's because you didn't close the bug in the upload.
>    * debian/rules: Remove use of ccache. (Closes: #945613 #954497)
> > Is this not the correct syntax for fixing multiple bugs?
> you'd need a comma to list more than bug after the 'Closes:', so it
> wasn't closed.

Thank you, I am confused because I actually checked the policy manual
carefully before doing this, and it clearly states that multiple bugs
should be space-separated.  Is it an error in the document?

https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-closes

> 5.6.22. Closes
>
> A space-separated list of bug report numbers that the upload governed by the .changes file closes.

> > If I manually close the bug, will it then migrate automatically?
>
> yes, that's exactly what you'll need to do.  Also, it would be better if
> you closed it with a fixed version as well.

Ok, I will skip this since it was closed by someone else but in the
future it would require a package update, got it.

regards,
Steve