[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#955808: marked as done (RFS: kxd/0.14-1.1 [NMU, RC] -- Key exchange daemon)



Your message dated Mon, 6 Apr 2020 09:55:09 +0200
with message-id <56f7cf62-39ea-3039-9bd8-12574e56be31@yahoo.no>
and subject line close bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #955808,
regarding RFS: kxd/0.14-1.1 [NMU, RC] -- Key exchange daemon
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
955808: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955808
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kxd"

 * Package name    : kxd
   Version         : 0.14-1.1
   Upstream Author :
 * URL             : https://blitiri.com.ar/p/kxd
 * License         : Expat
 * Vcs             : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/kxd
   Section         : net

It builds those binary packages:

  kxc - Key exchange daemon -- client
  kxd - Key exchange daemon

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/kxd

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kxd/kxd_0.14-1.1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Set absolute path in d/rules closes: #952332
   * Cherry-pick upstream commit, needed for upstream testsuite.
     0001-tests-Add-missing-conn.getresponse-which-was-causing.patch

Regards,
Håvard

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

--- End Message ---

Reply to: