Re: Sponsor for DMX - The Context Machine

[Juergen Neumann <j.neumann@junes.eu>]

Hi Andrey and Farbrice,

thank you very much for your feedback and your valuable hints. Yes, the
DMX sources are free software in the public. If in that case, building
from the binaries was ok, it would make things a bit easier on my end.
If not, I can start to work on managing the whole process from source.

Let me know, what you think.

Thx,

Juergen

Am Sonntag, den 05.04.2020, 15:24 +0500 schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin:
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 12:16:16PM +0200, Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY
> wrote:
> > Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
> > 
> > > On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 11:36:03PM +0200, Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY
> > > wrote:
> > > > - By building the upstream source (main)?  By packaging the
> > > > upstream
> > > >   binary (contrib)?
> > > Pre-built binaries are for non-free, not for contrib. Contrib is
> > > strictly
> > > DFSG-free.
> > 
> > Here the binaries seem to be free software (AGPL3 or GPL3).  Are
> > you sure?
> 
> Then what would stop them from being included in main if that was the
> only
> requirement?
> There is only one difference between main and contrib: "packages in
> main
> must not require or recommend a package outside of main for
> compilation or
> execution". Do you know about some rebuildability requirements being
> true
> only for main but not for contrib?
> 
-- 
GnuPG KeyID: CD914C6C
Fingerprint: C1CC EF1D 1443 7279 72E7 ABDC A2DA 0328 CD91 4C6C