[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#888246: RFS: ddccontrol/0.4.3-1



Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ddccontrol"

 * Package name    : ddccontrol
   Version         : 0.4.3-1
   Upstream Author : https://github.com/orgs/ddccontrol/people
 * URL             : https://github.com/ddccontrol/ddccontrol
 * License         : GNU General Public License v2.0
   Section         : utils

It builds those binary packages:

    ddccontrol - program to control monitor parameters
    gddccontrol - program to control monitor parameters (graphical interface)
    libddccontrol-dev - development files for ddccontrol
    libddccontrol0 - shared library for ddccontrol

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

    https://mentors.debian.net/package/ddccontrol

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/ddccontrol/ddccontrol_0.4.3-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

  ddccontrol (0.4.3-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release
  * debian/compat: increased compatibility level to 10
  * debian/control:
    * updated homepage to GitHub
    * updated VCS urls to GitHub
    * increased debhelper dependency version to 10
    * added build dependencies to build the release
  * debian/ddccontrol.docs: use README.md
  * debian/gddccontrol.dirs: install icons folder
  * debian/gddccontrol.install: install icons (moved from pixmaps)
  * debian/gddccontrol.menu: removed, because there is .desktop file
  * debian/libddccontrol0.postinst: removed, because ldconfig is called by
    trigger added by dh_makeshlibs/11
  * debian/libddccontrol0.postrm: removed, because ldconfig is called by
    trigger added by dh_makeshlibs/11
  * debian/rules: use autogen.sh, and enable-doc at configure

 -- Miroslav Kravec <kravec.miroslav@gmail.com>  Sat, 30 Dec 2017 11:56:57 +0100


Kind regards,
Miroslav Kravec

Reply to: