[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#877296: marked as done (RFS: dokuwiki-sync/0.1 ITP)

Your message dated Thu, 04 Jan 2018 16:48:29 +0100
with message-id <1515080909.20172.27.camel@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#877296: Subject: RFS: dokuwiki-sync/0.1 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #877296,
regarding RFS: dokuwiki-sync/0.1 ITP
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

877296: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877296
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,

This is just a small shell script I have used from time to time - I am
not sure how usable it is for others and it is mostly to get practise
of packaging and getting feedback. So please feel free to comment on
what might be a better tool or way to handle the task of synchronising
two wiki'd (dokuwiki based in this case only).

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dokuwiki-sync"

 * Package name    : dokuwiki-sync
   Version         : 0.1
   Upstream Author : Andrew Worsley <amworsley@gmail.com>
 * URL             :  https://github.com/amworsley/dokuwiki-sync
 * License         : GPL 2.0
   Section         : admin

  It builds those binary packages:

    dokuwiki-sync - synchronise dokuwiki trees

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dokuwiki-sync/dokuwiki-sync_0.1.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com.

  Initial Release to get any comments

   Andrew Worsley

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I agree with pabs... This should be probably upstreamed to dokuwiki.
I think it is not useful to have it as extra package,

(If you disagree, reopen the bug and let us know why you think it
should be an extra package)


--- End Message ---

Reply to: