Bug#876623: RFS: yamcha/0.33-2 -- General purpose chunker annotator
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 04:53:43AM +0200, Giulio Paci wrote:
> * Package name : yamcha
> Version : 0.33
> It builds those binary packages:
>
> libyamcha1 - general purpose chunker annotator - runtime library
> libyamcha-dev - general purpose chunker annotator - development files
> yamcha - general purpose chunker annotator
>
> The upload closes #875993.
>
> You can find the source of the package at:
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/yamcha.git
It seems like there are problems building docs:
.--====[ build log ]
dh_installdocs -pyamcha
dh_installdocs: Cannot find (any matches for) "html" (tried in .)
dh_installexamples -pyamcha
dh_installman -pyamcha
dh_installman: Cannot find (any matches for) "usr/share/man/man1/*.1" (tried in .)
`----
.--====[ debdiff yamcha_*deb ]
Files in first .deb but not in second
-------------------------------------
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/yamcha/html/feature.png
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/yamcha/html/feature2.png
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/yamcha/html/feature3.png
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/yamcha/html/feature4.png
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/yamcha/html/feature5.png
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/yamcha/html/index.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/yamcha/html/yamcha.css
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/yamcha/html/yamcha.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/lintian/overrides/yamcha
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/man/man1/yamcha.1.gz
`----
.--====[ lintian ]
W: yamcha: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/yamcha
E: yamcha: doc-base-file-references-missing-file yamcha:13 /usr/share/doc/yamcha/html/index.html
E: yamcha: doc-base-file-references-missing-file yamcha:14 /usr/share/doc/yamcha/html/*
`----
Meow!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ We domesticated dogs 36000 years ago; together we chased
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ animals, hung out and licked or scratched our private parts.
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Cats domesticated us 9500 years ago, and immediately we got
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ agriculture, towns then cities. -- whitroth on /.
Reply to: