Bug#849754: RFS: guerillabackup/0.0.0-1
Hello Andreas,
Andreas Henriksson writes:
> ...
> Sorry I have not had time to follow up to you. I simply don't have
> time. Hopefully my previous comments has been of some use to you,
> but I don't think I can help out anymore.
In my opinion, your length review really helped me a lot to improve
the quality of the package, especially it motivated me to review
the Python2/Python3-requirements of the target machines and migrate
to Python3 earlier than I would have done otherwise, even though
it required lengthy burn-in tests afterwards.
I regret, that I could not improve the situation about systemd:
there were no responses from systemd list and I did not find ways
to do better than now. The current configuration worked in all
tests, survived all boots and updates but is not as clean as it
should be.
As from my point of view, that lightweight tool might also be
useful for other Debian users, I hope, that someone else has the
time to continue the review. The whole review state was captured
in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849754 and
should be good groundwork for the next review.
Best regards,
hd
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 05:00:00AM +0000, halfdog wrote:
> > Hello Andreas,
> >
> > I did not hear from you after the last mails, see messages from
> > 04 May 2017 21:59, 23 Jun 2017 05:59. Are you still interested
> > in doing the (quite tricky) review?
> >
> > I have now also tested the build procedures and the software on
> > Debian Stretch, see today's upload of package to mentors.debian.org.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > hd
> >
> >
>
> Regards,
> Andreas Henriksson
Reply to: