On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 09:32:55PM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote: > >> * Non-maintainer upload > > If it's a NMU why does the RFS subject say ITA? > > And why are you doing this NMU? Please read > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu > > for valid NMU reasons and the correct process. > > I do not want to take this package away from Felix, > but I like to use a newer upstream version and a hardened build. > I opened a bug You didn't even mention that bug in the changelog. What is its number? > and send him an email with no response. How long ago? > ITA seems to be the best fit. Best fit for what? > In the current upload, I added myself as uploader, is this more suitable? That's even worse. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature