[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#801237: marked as done (RFS: mactel-boot/0.9-1 [ITP] -- hfs-bless utility for Intel Macs)

Your message dated Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:41:24 +0000
with message-id <E1aVXS0-00083H-Cd@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFS: mactel-boot/0.9-1 [ITP] -- hfs-bless utility for Intel Macs
has caused the Debian Bug report #801237,
regarding RFS: mactel-boot/0.9-1 [ITP] -- hfs-bless utility for Intel Macs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
801237: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801237
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
RFS: mactel-boot/0.9-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mactel-boot"

* Package name : mactel-boot
  Version : 0.9-1
  Upstream Author : Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
* URL : http://www.codon.org.uk/~mjg59/mactel-boot/
* License : GPL-2+
  Section : admin

It builds those binary packages:

mactel-boot - hfs-bless utility for Intel Macs

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/mactel-boot

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mactel-boot/mactel-boot_0.9-1.dsc

More information about hello can be obtained from
http://heeris.id.au/2014/ubuntu-plus-mac-pure-efi-boot/#fixing-efi


Regards,
Bernhard Reiter

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Package mactel-boot has been removed from mentors.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: