Hi Aaron M. Ucko, On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 13:11 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > linuxbrew-wrapper's control file declares amd64 to be the only > supported architure. Is that restriction really necessary? From what > I gather, Linuxbrew is perfectly capable of building software from > source, so it should be no big deal if prebuilt binaries aren't > available for other architectures. Agree with you. Linuxbrew upstream declares that it only supports amd64, and there is only amd64 machines for me to test, so I wrote amd64 in Architecture. > Please consider changing the Architecture value to linux-any, or even > any. This is quoted from upstream README: Linuxbrew does not currently support 32-bit x86 platforms nor platforms other than x86. It would be possible for Linuxbrew to work on 32-bit x86 platforms with some effort. which means users under ARCHs other than amd64 may need to take care of themselves. I don't think it's appropriate to bump Architecture from "amd64" to a wildcard without sort of notice to user. Thank you for reporting this issue!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part