El Dimecres, 9 de setembre de 2015, a les 23:01:21, Andrey Rahmatullin va escriure: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 07:43:05PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > I fighting against control@bugs and by now it's winning me. :-( I really > > don't understand what I'm doing wrong. I have a bug in one of my packages > > (ompl) that it's not fault of ompl, it's about boost. So, I would like to > > reassign it to boost1.58 or boost-defaults > > > > I have try to do a lot of things that i have found in the net, but I go > > always an error: > > > > Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > > > package ompl > > > > Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'ompl' > > Limit currently set to 'package':'ompl' > > > > > reassign 79728 boost-defaults > > > > Failed to clear fixed versions and reopen on 79728: Not altering archived > > bugs; see unarchive. > > I don't think you've meant #79728. Errare humanum est :-O thanks -- -- Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA Catalonia ------------------------------------- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.