[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#797885: marked as done ()

Your message dated Thu, 3 Sep 2015 12:32:28 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <1863105488.1241129.1441283548553.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#797885:
has caused the Debian Bug report #797885,
regarding 
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
797885: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797885
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist


Dear mentors,


I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-hashish"


* Package name : node-hashish

Version : 0.0.4+git34dfe43-1

Upstream Author : James Halliday <mail@substack.net>

* URL : https://github.com/substack/node-hashish/

* License : X11

Section : web


It builds those binary packages:


node-hashish - maniuplate hash data structures in Node.js


To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:


http://mentors.debian.net/package/node-hashish



Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:


dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-hashish/node-hashish_0.0.4+git34dfe43-1.dsc


I have hijacked old package from paultag, here in cc (with his blessing)


This package is in rdep of browserify needed for packaging a reverse
dep of grunt.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Nope, fine that way.

Built&Signed&Uploaded, thanks for your contribution to Debian!

cheers,

G.





Il Giovedì 3 Settembre 2015 14:29, Bastien Roucaries <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com> ha scritto:


Le 3 septembre 2015 13:53:08 GMT+02:00, Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfranco@yahoo.it> a écrit :
>Control: owner -1 !
>
>Hi Bastien
>
>I don't think using a fakeupstream in watch file is useful, can you
>please try to use github instead?

Upstream does not mâle github release  (bug open since 3 years). So  i was using fake upstream. 

Should i change?


Bastien
>
>the rest looks good.
>
>(maybe you want to remove lines in the rules file, but not a problem)
>
>cheers,
>
>G.

-- 
Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: