Bug#793876: RFS: chrony/1.31.1-1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 25/08/15 02:00, Vincent Blut wrote:
> Le mar. 25 août 2015 à 0:33, Jerome BENOIT <calculus@rezozer.net> a écrit :
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi:
>>
>> On 24/08/15 23:52, Vincent Blut wrote:
>>> After inspecting Jerome’s custom init script, it appreared it was buggy.
>>
>> To my defence: 1] the buggy part was commented as obsoleted, 2] it contains more material,
>> in particular support for /etc/network/if-*.d
>
> You're right, my sentence sounds like the whole init script was buggy, but that isn't the case.
> The context was about the supposedly "breakage" of the "-u" option expressed in [🔎] 55D503B7.7050909@rezozer.net
>
> Sorry, if that offended you!
I just wanted to clarify :-) I am bad, but that bad.
>
>>> However I’ll have to find a way not to mess with users who set the default
>>> chronyd user in the init script instead of using the "user" directive in
>>> /etc/chrony/chrony.conf. To be honest I don’t see an easy way of doing it,
>>> so a first good step will probably be to add a "warning" in a NEWS file.
>>
>> Note that regular users are not supposed to modify their /etc/init.d/chrony but
>> they are supposed to configure properly their /etc/chrony/chrony.conf .
>
> Sure, but it'd be great to mitigate upgrade issues for those that did so.
1] modified init.d scripts are managed by Debian at, so you do not have to worry about this;
2] most importantly, adventurous folks who modified their init.d scripts are supposed to know what they do.
>
>> I modify my /etc/init.d/chrony mainly to get /etc/network/if-*.d support.
>> BTW, is PPP stuff still needed ?
>
> Yes, there are still Dial-up only internet accesses here and there, but its
> usage dropped significantly in favor of broadband Internet access.
>
>> In short, you may rather focus on #312092 and #633422
>>
>> hth,
>> Jerome
>
> Cheers,
> Vincent
Best wishes,
Jerome
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV27+EAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjRnYIAITEFF3Su3naL4SGDt0TpieR
vxSqaN/lfgluHso5/HqmHMemMQM17WgVWSgVTMjO0kexl6/ZBJI1WoLiPL236vWY
1wOHu11ks1XD9S7WLDkoFUkg9gDUFMcT9T7GMUh9TAGTaEgfNauWSbIWNfl+fj2t
c91W16WLldoFnKCIHfAjhRGLuvhfEKRDY08uo5Q35r6yUjTeHNeLZiggmuv5U8FT
1rc5lDEcGWmPX8gK0Z4X6m+CVdA+Xzowaq2qX2pBMLYn/H84+WOUvJmsaF93HD2g
PyOj2WaZg9q7SZ5MsedY1sUItgunA9+gbtdKLoXbNkOZaKA5+GP/N/3b9L83AYI=
=mxTm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: