Bug#793331: RFS: postsrsd/1.2-1 [ITP]
Hi,
On 18-08-15 01:01, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
great! Just nit-picking here, really. And trying to understand
AppArmor :).
You seem to be right, I've committed a patch to remove the m flag.
Yes, I tried without postconf present and the unit failed.
Its output is silenced, and postsrsd fails
when the -d argument is empty anyway.
I don't think you want this systemd unit to fail *by default*.
Hmm, you're right about that. Would a Recommends be good enough, or do
we really need a hard dependency? I'd like to avoid adding a hard
dependency only for the systemd unit (since the daemon itself runs fine
without postfix), and failing is in my opinion the only reasonable
option when neither postconf nor a configured domain is present.
Sorry, I didn't notice that. I agree, though, that it would make sense
to put all configuation in one place.
I looked a bit further into this, and Debian Policy 9.3.2 says that
removing the /etc/default file should be supported, so I don't think we
can drop the defaults from the systemd unit.
Cheers,
Oxan
Reply to: