[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#796187: marked as done (RFS: [ITP] django-jinja/1.4.1-1)



Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:44:27 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <167158709.4529457.1440063867783.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#796187: RFS: [ITP] django-jinja/1.4.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #796187,
regarding RFS: [ITP] django-jinja/1.4.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
796187: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796187
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "django-jinja"

 * Package name    : django-jinja
   Version         : 1.4.1-1
   Upstream Author : Andrey Antukh <niwi@niwi.be>
 * URL             : https://github.com/niwibe/django-jinja
 * License         : BSD-3-clause
   Section         : python

It builds those binary packages:

  python-django-jinja - Jinja2 templating language integrated in Django
  python3-django-jinja - Jinja2 templating language integrated in Django (Python 3 version)

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/django-jinja

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/django-jinja/django-jinja_1.4.1-1.dsc

Regards,
-- 
Edward.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
well, it appeared at the end

"Copyright: 2015, Edward Betts"
please add your mail


(it might be rejected for this reason I guess... not sure).

I'm rebuilding right now to see if the Runtime-Dependencies
are correctly picked up :)

if you can fix this in the meanwhile...

cheers,

G.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: