Bug#776120: RFS: beret/1.2.1+git4e2f21bf4eeabfd137b2b846756a368b42456675-1 [ITP]
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Jacob Adams wrote:
> At this point the only remaining problems with my package appear to be
> binary-without-manpage and debian-watch-file-is-missing which also shows
> up in fonts-averia-sans.
>
> beret has a manpage, so should I override that?
AFAICT the manual page isn't installed in the package so the lintian
warning is valid.
> Neither package uses tarballs, and lintian suggests explain why I cannot
> use a watch file in a watch file but doing so brings up a even more
> severe warning (debian-watch-file-missing-version). What should I do?
That sounds like a bug in lintian, it should not emit that warning for
watch files containing only comments.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: