Re: Looking for guidance on multi-binary package with private DSOs
[I'm subscribed, no need to CC]
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Tristan Schmelcher wrote:
> Thanks guys. The confusion I'm concerned about in (2) is not the
> library files themselves, but the package names. If we install
> roccat-tools' liblua.so.2 to, say, /usr/lib/<arch>/roccat/liblua.so.2,
> should it's package name just be liblua2, or something else? I can
> imagine a Lua programming language developer mistakenly installing
> roccat-tools' liblua2 package when they really want liblua5.2-0. This
> is why I'm thinking that we might want to name the package something
> like roccat-modules-lua2.
I'd suggest bundling all of these libraries with the roccat-tools
package, if they really need splitting out, your proposed naming
(roccat-modules-)* sounds good.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: