Re: Looking for guidance on multi-binary package with private DSOs

[Tristan Schmelcher <tristan_schmelcher@alumni.uwaterloo.ca>]

Thanks guys. The confusion I'm concerned about in (2) is not the
library files themselves, but the package names. If we install
roccat-tools' liblua.so.2 to, say, /usr/lib/<arch>/roccat/liblua.so.2,
should it's package name just be liblua2, or something else? I can
imagine a Lua programming language developer mistakenly installing
roccat-tools' liblua2 package when they really want liblua5.2-0. This
is why I'm thinking that we might want to name the package something
like roccat-modules-lua2.