Bug#775194: RFS: mininet/2.2.0 ITP - process-based network emulator
On 17/01/15 22:33, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 17 janvier 2015 22:17 +0100, Tomasz Buchert <tomasz.buchert@inria.fr> :
>
> >> I am fine with the package as is. What do you think about what I said
> >> about debian/copyright and the MIT/Expat license?
>
> > my only concern is that the text of the license is not
> > literally the MIT/Expat license so I would prefer to call
> > it differently. See (https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#license-specification):
> >
> > "These short names have the specified meanings across all uses of this
> > file format, and must not be used to refer to any other
> > licenses. Parsers may thus rely on these short names referring to the
> > same licenses wherever they occur, without needing to parse or compare
> > the full license text.
>
> OK, I don't mind. We'll see what FTP masters will say about that. The
> package is ready to upload, should I?
> --
> Debian package sponsoring guidelines:
> http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html
I believe so :).
Tomasz
Reply to: