❦ 17 janvier 2015 22:17 +0100, Tomasz Buchert <tomasz.buchert@inria.fr> : >> I am fine with the package as is. What do you think about what I said >> about debian/copyright and the MIT/Expat license? > my only concern is that the text of the license is not > literally the MIT/Expat license so I would prefer to call > it differently. See (https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#license-specification): > > "These short names have the specified meanings across all uses of this > file format, and must not be used to refer to any other > licenses. Parsers may thus rely on these short names referring to the > same licenses wherever they occur, without needing to parse or compare > the full license text. OK, I don't mind. We'll see what FTP masters will say about that. The package is ready to upload, should I? -- Debian package sponsoring guidelines: http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature