Re: Bug#773632: RFS: pcsx2/1.2.1-783-g1f54bb7+dfsg-1 [ITP]
On 22/12/14 23:40, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:50:59 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 09:30:45PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
>>>>> * In d/changelog, urgency should be "low" since it's a new
>>>>> package
>>>> Is this documented somewhere?
>>> My mentor had told me upon the second upload of my package
>>> that I could optionally change the priority to medium (and the
>>> New Maintainer Guide recommends not going above "low"), so that
>>> is how I came to believe this.
>> Medium is default for about an year.
>
> Correct.
>
> Testing migration for packages not in testing still is 10 days.
> Cf.
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2013/11/msg00007.html
>
>
>
("Default Urgency"); maybe that's what Riley's mentor had in mind.
Ah, okay, thanks. Should I file a bug against maint-guide? ("urgency
shouldn't be changed to anything higher than low")
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.html#changelog
Reply to: