Le 21/07/2014 10:37, Guido van Steen a écrit : > } IMHO, the right place for discussing a particular package is it's ITP > } bug (when the package is prospective) or the RFS bug. > > AFAIAA there is no ITP or RFS for the package debexpo (the software at > issue, which is running at mentors.debian.net). > > Guido > Hi, this is not what I mean: I don't like the "comments" feature of debexpo, my opinion is that comments on a to-be-sponsored package should be sent to the corresponding RFS bug. Debexpo has its own bug tracker: https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?atid=413115&group_id=100127&func=browse I guess it is supposed to be used for feature requests concerning debexpo. Kind regards, Thibaut. -- * Dr Thibaut Paumard | LESIA/CNRS - Table équatoriale (bât. 5) * * Tel: +33 1 45 07 78 60 | Observatoire de Paris - Section de Meudon * * Fax: +33 1 45 07 79 17 | 5, Place Jules Janssen * * thibaut.paumard@obspm.fr | 92195 MEUDON CEDEX (France) *
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: Signature cryptographique S/MIME