[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#735685: RFS: libnftables/0.0.0~20131209-1 [ITP]



On 17 January 2014 17:59, Neutron Soutmun <neo.neutron@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have no right to upload, but I'm interested in "nftables" also.
> therefore, I have both dget and git clone your source package for
> testing and reviewing.
>
> Below is my review.
>

Thanks you for the review!

Some comments below.

> * debian/control:
>   + could bump the standards-version to 3.9.5 as lintian has warned right now.
>    (found a revert commit in git :P)

Fixed, but for the next version of the package.

>   + cosmetic, please apply wrap-and-sort -sa
>

I don't like it. If not required, I would leave this as is.

> * debian/copyright:
>   + forgot the debian/* license

isn't needed, since 3.9.3.

>   + the upstream license could be GPL-2+ as mention in the COPYING file

fixed, for the next version of the package.

>
> * debian/watch:
>   + I know you plan the watch file for the upstream first release but
>     it could be changed later, for my suggestion is
>
> === 8< ===
> opts=uversionmangle=s/^/0.0.0~/ \
>   http://ftp.netfilter.org/pub/libnftables/snapshot/libnftables-(\d\S*).tar.bz2
> === 8< ===
>
>     just track the snapshot tarball, I know it's nonsense but it's not
> broken watch file :)
>

Changing this will require another change in a [near] future. I don't
see the point.

> * vcs-git:
>   + cloned, the "git buildpackage -S" is failed. the upstream tag
>     << upstream/0.0.0_20131209 >> is missing.
>

I added the tag :)

> Hopefully, the package will be sponsored soon. Good luck.
>

Again, thanks!

-- 
Arturo Borrero González


Reply to: