Re: Add debug files to existing packages or add -dbg packages?
You should male a dedicated dbg package.
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-dbg
Tony Houghton <h@realh.co.uk> schrieb:
>ROXTerm is going to need a new release soon and I'd like to include
>debugging symbols. It currently has binary packages roxterm-common
>(data
>files), roxterm-gtk3 (executables linked with GTK3 etc) and
>roxterm-gtk2
>(linked with GTK2 etc). Should debugging symbols always be put in
>separate -dbg packages or can they be added to existing packages? If
>there is a choice I'm leaning towards the latter.
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
Reply to: