[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RFS: python-gnatpython [fourth try]



Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-gnatpython".

 * Package name    : python-gnatpython
   Version         : 54-1
   Upstream Author : AdaCore <sales@adacore.com>
 * URL             : http://forge.open-do.org/projects/gnatpython
 * License         : GPL-2+ and GPL-3+
   Section         : python

It builds those binary packages:

python-gnatpython - python framework to ease development of test suites
python-gnatpython-doc - python framework to ease development of test
suites (examples)

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-gnatpython

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-gnatpython/python-gnatpython_54-1.dsc

This new package is a build dependency for the polyorb package.

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
It is my first python package and I have followed most advices from
Jakub Wilk [1], Simon Chopin [2] and Nicolas Boulenguez thanks to them.

After the following lintian command :
lintian --pedantic -EI python-gnatpython_54-1_amd64.changes
the package still presents the following I/P comments :
I: python-gnatpython source: debian-watch-file-is-missing
P: python-gnatpython: no-upstream-changelog
P: python-gnatpython-doc: no-upstream-changelog
P: python-gnatpython-doc: example-unusual-interpreter
usr/share/doc/python-gnatpython-doc/examples/echo_testsuite/run-test
#!gnatpython

Since there isn't any changelog in upstream and the source are only
available under a subversion repository I don't know how to fix the
first three comments. And since the fourth is a P comment and present in
an example I don't think it's worth the work to fix it.

Kind regards,

Grave Xavier
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2011/09/msg00078.html
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/01/msg00396.html


Reply to: