Re: upstream changelog in XML format
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Jerome BENOIT <g6299304p@rezozer.net> wrote:
> Thanks for your reply:
You're quite welcome.
> On 23/01/12 19:54, Samuel Bronson wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Jerome BENOIT<g6299304p@rezozer.net>
>> wrote:
>>> Is there a better way to deal with this `Changes.xml' ?
>>> I guess that I can add some stuff in the makefile to convert it in text
>>> format:
>>> do specific tools exist to convert this kind of changelog in text format
>>> ?
>>
>> If I were you, I'd ask upstream about that
>
> I have just sent a couple of questions about it to the upstream maintainer.
Good.
>> , or (since a quick google
>> shows that this is a TeX-related program) ask about it on
>> <http://tex.stackexchange.com> (a Q&A site about TeX with loads of
>> extremely helpful people on it).
>
> The Q&A are about [La]TeX.
> BibTool is mainly a tool to manipulate BibTeX databases,
> and as such it is not directly related to [La]TeX.
Eh, they aren't terribly picky: any part of a TeX system is considered
fair game there, including just about everything on CTAN. The worst
that is likely to happen is that nobody will answer; they aren't
likely to close it as off-topic.
Reply to: