[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Correct value for DEP5’s Format: field?



On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 09:58:25AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:

> Andrea Bolognani <eof@kiyuko.org> writes:
> 
> > I’m updating a debian/copyright file in DEP5 format, but I’m finding
> > myself unable to pick an acceptable value for the Format: field.
> 
> This is a temporary transitional annoyance that exists for a long and
> complex set of reasons that isn't really worth getting into, but will
> hopefully be resolved soon.
> 
> In the meantime, you have your choice of using a URL that Lintian likes
> but which doesn't actually exist, using the unversioned URL to DEP-5,
> which Lintian complains about but which is otherwise a fairly reasonable
> choice for right now, or using the ViewVC URI, which I didn't realize
> would work but which does seem to be versioned (even though Lintian
> doesn't know about it).

The ViewVC seems the most reasonable choice, seeing it’s the only one
having versioning; however, from the DEP5 Web page I get the impression
it is developed using Bazaar, and ViewVC shows the contents of an SVN
repository which doesn’t quite seem to be a mirror of the Bazaar one.

Given the situation, I guess I’ll just use the unversioned URI and hope
DEP5 will become official soon.

Thank you for your input on the matter. 

-- 
Andrea Bolognani <eof@kiyuko.org>
Resistance is futile, you will be garbage collected.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: