Re: RFS: Planner (orphan package)
Josue Abarca <jmaslibre@debian.org.gt> writes:
> Wences Arana and I intend to adopt planner, so now we are looking for
> a sponsor for our package "planner".
[...]
> The package is lintian (pedantic) clean.
Fortunately for me, it's not algernon-clean just yet!
docs
====
Why are you installing the AUTHORS file into the binary package? That's
pretty much covered in debian/copyright anyway. Similarly, I find the
README fairly useless too, as most of the information in it is already
available in the debian package.
It's only the NEWS file I'd keep, and a quick glance through it suggests
that it's enough to put that into the planner package, -dev, -doc and
-data don't really need a copy, I believe.
debian/source/local-options
===========================
Erm, this thing is, well, local. It's not in the package in any shape or
form, so... why mention it in the changelog? (Or perhaps you want it as
debian/source/options instead?)
This is all for now. Other than this, the package looks fine after a
quick glance, and unless I find anything more severe by the time this
mail gets answered and I'm done testing the binaries, I'm willing to
upload as-is.
--
|8]
Reply to: